Re: RETRACTION: Re: Intent To Package: readlink

To: "Zephaniah E. Hull" <warp@whitestar.soark.net>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RETRACTION: Re: Intent To Package: readlink
From: ruud@ruud.org (Ruud de Rooij)
Date: 09 Nov 1999 18:01:08 +0100
Message-id: <87bt937g6j.fsf@hobbes.home.ruud.org>
In-reply-to: "Zephaniah E. Hull"'s message of "Tue, 9 Nov 1999 10:04:35 -0500"
References: <19991109095445.A2096@whitestar.soark.net> <19991109100435.B2096@whitestar.soark.net>

"Zephaniah E. Hull" <warp@whitestar.soark.net> writes:

> Ok, I've been convinced, this is a retraction for the ITP..

Oops, sorry.  Please ignore my previous message on this topic.

	- Ruud de Rooij.
-- 
ruud de rooij | ruud@ruud.org | http://ruud.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RETRACTION: Re: Intent To Package: readlink
  - From: Peter S Galbraith <GalbraithP@dfo-mpo.gc.ca>

References:
- Intent To Package: readlink
  - From: "Zephaniah E. Hull" <warp@whitestar.soark.net>
- RETRACTION: Re: Intent To Package: readlink
  - From: "Zephaniah E. Hull" <warp@whitestar.soark.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Bugs in apache & libapache-mod-perl - can they be upgraded?
Next by Date: Re: Intent To Package: readlink
Previous by thread: RETRACTION: Re: Intent To Package: readlink
Next by thread: Re: RETRACTION: Re: Intent To Package: readlink
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread