On Thu, Sep 02, 1999 at 11:32:08PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
> I think we have an obligation to provide readline4 as an option at least
> if for no other reason than to make it available to people writing C++
> code[2] who otherwise must resort to evil things...
This is a bug against libreadlineg2-dev then --- it's header files should
work from both C and C++ without complaint.
> Okay, where's the first accusation of package hijacking? => I'll take
> you all on! Yeah, I ain't scared of ya's! Are ya's yellah or sumthin?[4]
None of the package names seem like they'd conflict, so I don't see the
problem personally. I'd say go for it.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. PGP encrypted mail preferred.
``The thing is: trying to be too generic is EVIL. It's stupid, it
results in slower code, and it results in more bugs.''
-- Linus Torvalds
Attachment:
pgpSLAqV_Wtb_.pgp
Description: PGP signature