Re: Postfix as default MTA?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:30:22 +0200, Thomas Quinot wrote:
>Postfix is generally regarded as being far more
>secure than other MTAs such as Sendmail or Exim, and
>is also very fast and easy to configure.
>[ ObCaveat: let's discuss the respective /technical/ merit
> of /both/ MTAs, no flamewar please :) ].
If that is the case, then why the obviously general statement above?
Personally I see nothing about Postfix which makes it more secure than Exim
in any regard.
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
- -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc
iQA/AwUBN3dCJnpf7K2LbpnFEQKRPgCfbu0dLEmTuXJ7Q73vQgLLPbBYwGQAmwQG
YVTeab8AOmjPr+bi5QmjdkMI
=fpVQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: