Re: using GnuPG to sign packages?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: using GnuPG to sign packages?
From: Guy Maor <maor@debian.org>
Date: 29 Apr 1999 20:04:08 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 87vhee7qs7.fsf@femto.dyn.ml.org>
In-reply-to: <planders@mail.utexas.edu>'s message of "Thu, 29 Apr 1999 15:33:29 -0500 (CDT)"
References: <[🔎] 14120.48708.898409.87101@localhost>

<planders@mail.utexas.edu> writes:

> I'm wondering if it's okay to use GnuPG to sign Debian packages[1]
> rather than PGP, especially in conjunction with dpkg-buildpackage. 

Not yet, because dinstall doesn't support it.  But it should.


Guy

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: using GnuPG to sign packages?
  - From: md@linux.it (Marco d'Itri)

References:
- using GnuPG to sign packages?
  - From: <planders@mail.utexas.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: German Dictionary (fwd)
Next by Date: Re: using GnuPG to sign packages?
Previous by thread: Re: using GnuPG to sign packages?
Next by thread: Re: using GnuPG to sign packages?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread