Re: Removing bash (Was: /etc/init.d/network is too simple?)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Fri, 16 Apr 1999 13:16:32 -0400 (EDT), shaleh@clifford.livenet.net wrote:
>As is mine. But /bin/bash still exists. I would like to here how you made
>all the bash scripts use /bin/sh. I have mailed the maints of many and made
>pure bourne out of them. But some need bash.
>There is a difference between removing bash and making /bin/sh be something
>else. There are also a few Debian-ites who use ksh instead.
In this case, though, it is not. He was talking about an init script
which, at least in my point of view, should only use #!/bin/sh. There was a
discussion a while ago of keeping the system scripts as shell neutral as
possible. In that context, changing /bin/sh to point to ash, or ksh, is the
same as removing.
My apologies for being unclear on the concept I was trying to convey.
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
- -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc
iQCVAwUBNxdvuKC6xbtZwvdnAQHzHAP+K+Zlzi0blSaYV9CUzOk2ASfbUPPwxkrO
uEmEexeKsfINACxvdmbroa1d5ENGJQ02NojoA5vW9ZPLR1RBw4wwjlUBa7VZkUSW
C3OA9mmKAHtBFMSfaoKVuBOGa3S4315BHrk0560A08+UCepAV/FQzv4TTxp0Um8A
wkH9KvLyDRY=
=PB1W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: