Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy?
On 12-Apr-99, 12:58 (CDT), "Darren O. Benham" <gecko@debian.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 1999 at 01:41:47PM -0400, Jonathan P Tomer wrote:
> > > Yep, it also implys nosuid (maybe noexec as well, but i'm not positive)
> >
> > yeah, noexec and nosuid are both implied by user. can someone explain to me
> > what is the point of having noexec though? anyone who can read the device
> > can just copy the file over to his home directory and then it is executable,
> > so why bother?
>
> Ownership changes when you copy?
So? If it's nosuid, does it matter?
steveg
Reply to: