Re: .deb and .rpm package coexistance

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: .deb and .rpm package coexistance
From: Edward Betts <edward@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 23:32:09 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 19990408233209.A971@hairnet.demon.co.uk>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 006a01be81ec$73e4ec00$02454545@hawkeye>; from Ben Farrell on Thu, Apr 08, 1999 at 07:14:08PM +0100
References: <00b901be81bd$a83db150$29ae3cc1@is2639.tay.ac.uk> <19990408163852.A1959@hairnet.demon.co.uk> <[🔎] 006a01be81ec$73e4ec00$02454545@hawkeye>

On Thu, 08 Apr, 1999, Ben Farrell wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Edward Betts <edward@hairnet.demon.co.uk>
> To: BENJAMIN FARRELL <i97bf@tay.ac.uk>
> Sent: Thursday, April 08, 1999 4:38 PM
> Subject: Re: .deb and .rpm package coexistance
> 
> > Next example?

-- 
I consume, therefore I am

Attachment: pgpcALNOOsglu.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re: .deb and .rpm package coexistance
  - From: "Ben Farrell" <i97bf@tay.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#35743: knfs: needs to replace nfs-server
Next by Date: Re: Intent to package: metamath
Previous by thread: Re: .deb and .rpm package coexistance
Next by thread: (sp)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread