Re: Bug#35743: knfs: needs to replace nfs-server

To: Anders Hammarquist <iko@cd.chalmers.se>
Cc: clameter@debian.org, 35743@bugs.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#35743: knfs: needs to replace nfs-server
From: Samuel Tardieu <sam@debian.org>
Date: 08 Apr 1999 18:24:58 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87k8vndqqt.fsf@zaphod.enst.fr>
Reply-to: Samuel Tardieu <sam@debian.org>
In-reply-to: Anders Hammarquist's message of "Thu, 08 Apr 1999 16:13:48 +0200"
References: <[🔎] 199904081413.QAA09263@haddock.cd.chalmers.se>

>>>>> "Anders" == Anders Hammarquist <iko@cd.chalmers.se> writes:

Anders> Now that 2.2 is out, this may be less of a concern though. So
Anders> I'm soliciting opinions... Should knfs replace nfs-server?

I've discussed this topic with someone doing heavy NFS operations
between Linux machines, and he told me that knfs was much faster than
nfsd. Any reason not to include both, and select automatically one or
the other depending on the kernel version?

  Sam
-- 
Samuel Tardieu -- sam@debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug#35743: knfs: needs to replace nfs-server
  - From: Paul Slootman <paul@wau.mis.ah.nl>

References:
- Re: Bug#35743: knfs: needs to replace nfs-server
  - From: Anders Hammarquist <iko@cd.chalmers.se>

Prev by Date: Re: UK get-together
Next by Date: Re: Gore2000 "Open Source"
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#35743: knfs: needs to replace nfs-server
Next by thread: Re: Bug#35743: knfs: needs to replace nfs-server
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread