Re: Why smail not exim?
On Mon, Feb 15, 1999 at 08:42:23AM +0100 , Debian Mail wrote:
> > In slink we use exim.
>
> I see. So please let me ask you this: What made you do that? (What I'm
> looking for is a comparison of advantages/drawbacks of smail
I'd say that the configuration is easier, at least it was for me. And
I like the format of config file of exim much more.
> vs. exim. Also what problems can arrise when switching from smail to
> exim: I have different virtual domains using the multihome recipe, and
> wonder if I can keep that)
Yes, sure. It's only that exim is standard, so it gets installed on a fresh
install. It won't remove existing smail package.
Petr Cech
--
/ mailto: cech@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
| PGP: finger cech@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz |
\ C75B671E75117038 43BE6B9AC09C3318 /
Reply to: