Re: More i18n of the base system : perl scripts
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Adam Di Carlo, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
>Well, if the idea is to integrate POSIX.pm into perl-base, then the
>issue of the priority of this temporary package isn't really all that
>relevant, since it would just go away. Given this, I would say
>priority 'optional' (removing required packages is evil).
>
>> What do you think about it ? If we can agree on this, then i'll
>> probably modify those script in order to be i18ned and will send
>> patches to the maintainers.
>
>Yes; I would discuss with the perl-base maintainer first; I don't have
>the technical info on Perl to really know how reasonable your plan is.
Well, if the question is whether POSIX.pm can be included in perl-base,
the answer is yes but it's rather big. (250-300K or so) If that's not
the question, you'll have to fill me in more. I haven't had time to
follow all the threads in debian-devel lately.
Darren
- --
<torin@daft.com> <http://www.daft.com/~torin> <torin@debian.org> <torin@io.com>
Darren Stalder/2608 Second Ave, @282/Seattle, WA 98121-1212/USA/+1-800-921-4996
@ Sysadmin, webweaver, postmaster for hire. C/Perl/CGI/Pilot programmer/tutor @
@ Make a little hot-tub in your soul. @
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.1, an Emacs/PGP interface
iQCVAwUBNsVaqI4wrq++1Ls5AQGTcAQAh6SHyCCkZDz5xnIuvnGLXThYRxbrVT/O
xZOhHUblkMkvuNvn3eVXaS2s60L90EFrmhX+5NaK9nT0Wngb3jIAedHQzU8fecCU
Qq+tuk20Q71ImdwjfkPj+Ar8J9/yn4cxhf8NYM9tW2y6hLhF/qFcNiJ5o1ElaseP
qSJ4DO5ocCY=
=e+Fk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: