Re: The so-called "remote exploit in pine"

To: Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: The so-called "remote exploit in pine"
From: Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@cs.leidenuniv.nl>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 15:28:32 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 19990212152832.B3782@cs.leidenuniv.nl>
Mail-followup-to: Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.990212140656.2739A-100000@cantor.unex.es>; from Santiago Vila on Fri, Feb 12, 1999 at 02:18:54PM +0100
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.990212140656.2739A-100000@cantor.unex.es>

Previously Santiago Vila wrote:
> I will let the Debian security experts to decide about the severity of
> these bugs (previously 33099 was "critical" and 33210 "normal").

Unless someone beats me to it I'll look into this on monday (I'm away
this weekend).

Wichert.

-- 
Debian GNU/Linux      .    Security Managers      .   security@debian.org
	      debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
  Christian Hudon     .     Wichert Akkerman      .     Martin Schulze
<chrish@debian.org>   .   <wakkerma@debian.org>   .   <joey@debian.org>

Attachment: pgpuojS9Zdbp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- The so-called "remote exploit in pine"
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>

Prev by Date: Re: List of bugs that *must* be fixed before releasing Slink
Next by Date: Free Haskell implementations (Was: Re: Admin tools - idea from left field)
Previous by thread: Processed: The so-called "remote exploit in pine"
Next by thread: Re: The so-called "remote exploit in pine"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread