Re: procps contains no dev package
Craig Small wrote:
> I think there was a change here from "shouldn't" to "doesn't". procps
> does include libproc-dev but, from what I have heard from the upstream
> guys, it shouldn't due to the unstability of the APIs. So it is use at
> your own risk.
Ok.
> I'll make sure that the conflict is in there. For those doubters, here
> is the packages, to be uploaded to master soon.
> scooter$ ls *_1\.9\.0-2*\.deb
> libproc-dev_1.9.0-2_i386.deb procps_1.9.0-2_i386.deb
> procps-nonfree_1.9.0-2_i386.deb xproc_1.9.0-2_i386.deb
>
> procps-nonfree? Well it seems that skill has been non-free all this
> time...
Ugh. You really should split the source package too then.
--
see shy jo
Reply to: