Re: Conflicting packages not of extra priority.

[John Hasler <john@dhh.gt.org>]

Santiago Vila writes:
> You will be glad to know that I have already presented a formal proposal
> to change the defintion of "extra" to this:

> "This contains packages that conflict with others with required,
> important, standard or optional priorities, or are only likely to be
> useful if you already know what they are or have specialised requirements."

Don't you need an exception for c/p/r's and such?
-- 
John Hasler                This posting is in the public domain.
john@dhh.gt.org		   Do with it what you will.
Dancing Horse Hill         Make money from it if you can; I don't mind.
Elmwood, Wisconsin         Do not send email advertisements to this address.