[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: redundant binaries



"dan" == dan  <dan@rn082110.mrs.umn.edu> writes:

dan> Is there a reason for having multiple copies of these files, and
dan> if not, is it worth tracking them all down and filing bug
dan> reports?

They aren't multiple copies, they're the same file with multiple
names.  UNIX calls this a "hardlink" and dpkg supports it.  (Faster, I
guess.)

Do a ls -i and you'll see that the redundant stuff in question have
the same inode number.

---------------------  PGP  E4 70 6E 59 80 6A F5 78  63 32 BC FB 7A 08 53 4C
 
   __ _    Debian GNU         Johnie Ingram <johnie@netgod.net>      mm   mm
  / /(_)_ __  _   ___  __       www.netgod.net irc.debian.org         mm mm
 / / | | '_ \| | | \ \/ /                                             m m m
/ /__| | | | | |_| |>  <      World Domination, of course.           mm   mm
\____/_|_| |_|\__,_/_/\_\           And scantily clad females.       GO BLUE


Reply to: