Dale Scheetz writes: > No but your reading of the statement seems to imply that you wish only > optional and above package conflicts to enforce the Extra priority. This > implies that any package that conflicts with an Extra package _must_ be > in one of the other priority groups. I don't see that. Nothing says that two Extra packages may not conflict. -- John Hasler john@dhh.gt.org (John Hasler) Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI