Re: Conflicting packages not of extra priority.

[John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>]

On Thu, Feb 04, 1999 at 10:14:42PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:

> > > packages which have "higher priorities"? Which ones? Obviously, since we
> > > are talking about packages which have extra priority, it refers to all the
> > > other priorities: required, important, standard and optional.
> > > 
> > > So, extra is where packages which conflict with others with
> > > required, important, standard and optional priorities should go.
> > 
> > No, where packages that conflict with a different package OF A HIGHER
> > PRIORITY THAN ITSELF.
> 
> Oh, yeah.
> 
> According to your interpretation, conflicting packages which are both
> required, or both important, are allowed, right? :-)

That's what it says.

> 
> -- 
>  "6cd5d43830b0a4dcc513dddace646454" (a truly random sig)