Re: Conflicting packages not of extra priority.
On Thu, 4 Feb 1999, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 1999 at 09:56:19PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> > packages which have "higher priorities"? Which ones? Obviously, since we
> > are talking about packages which have extra priority, it refers to all the
> > other priorities: required, important, standard and optional.
> >
> > So, extra is where packages which conflict with others with
> > required, important, standard and optional priorities should go.
>
> No, where packages that conflict with a different package OF A HIGHER
> PRIORITY THAN ITSELF.
Oh, yeah.
According to your interpretation, conflicting packages which are both
required, or both important, are allowed, right? :-)
--
"6cd5d43830b0a4dcc513dddace646454" (a truly random sig)
Reply to: