Re: Conflicting packages not of extra priority.
On Thu, 4 Feb 1999, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 1999 at 08:32:25PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> > Now that the current policy about optional and extra packages has been
> > clarified by Ian Jackson:
> >
> > http://www.de.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-policy-9902/msg00023.html
> >
> > it may be worth to fix some of the priority values in slink to comply with
> > policy.
>
> There is only one person's opinion; [...]
This is what the person who wrote the policy said it meant.
You will not change the policy by saying it means a different thing.
It may be poorly worded, but this is what it means.
--
"4bae17ffb629c56c7ef76f1fdc967af2" (a truly random sig)
Reply to: