Re: glibc 2.1 and potato
On Wed, 3 Feb 1999, Joel Klecker wrote:
> 'deb http://www.debian.org/%7Eespy/ glibc-2.1/binary-$(ARCH)/'. I
> don't intend to upload to unstable until a) slink is released and b)
> it has been decided how to deal with the libstdc++2.9 issue[0].
> There are also some other libraries (besides libstdc++) that need to
> be recompiled to allow new programs to link against them, such as
> ncurses (and any other library that uses libio (you can tell by
> looking for _IO_* symbols)), however in that case, the new libraries
> will continue to work with old programs.
Uhm, it will be ... lots of libraries.
gorgo@lovi:/usr/lib$ grep -l _IO_ *.so | wc -l
54
This is more than half of the installed libs...
So it is only the libstdc++ library that needs a new soname ? The others
don't ?
--
Madarasz Gergely gorgo@caesar.elte.hu gorgo@linux.rulez.org
It's practically impossible to look at a penguin and feel angry.
Egy pingvinre gyakorlatilag lehetetlen haragosan nezni.
HuLUG: http://mlf.linux.rulez.org/
Reply to: