Re: BTS says qmail's sendmail-clone is broken
On Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 12:00:46PM -0500, Phillip R. Jaenke wrote:
> As I said; I'll test it. Going on your word, I'll assume it broken. I
> should be able to fix it by diffing against clean 1.01 source, as i know
> that clean 1.01's sendmail replacement bin is not broken. (clean being
> defined as not debianized;)
The terminology needs to change. It's not 'broken' it's lacking a feature
that the BTS needs. Going back to pristine source wont help.
--
----- -- - -------- --------- ---- ------- ----- - - --- --------
Ben Collins <b.m.collins@larc.nasa.gov> Debian GNU/Linux
UnixGroup Admin - Jordan Systems Inc. bcollins@debian.org
------ -- ----- - - ------- ------- -- The Choice of the GNU Generation
Reply to: