Re: BTS says qmail's sendmail-clone is broken
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Phillip R. Jaenke wrote:
> > The sendmail replacement bin likely isn't broken.
> It is; this has nothing to do with security or what kind of mailbox is used.
> debbugs uses an option (forgot what, I'll look it up tomorrow if nobody
> does it before me) that every mailer except qmail handles. Please check your
> facts before making statements like this.
As I said; I'll test it. Going on your word, I'll assume it broken. I
should be able to fix it by diffing against clean 1.01 source, as i know
that clean 1.01's sendmail replacement bin is not broken. (clean being
defined as not debianized;)
If I sound a bit confusing, I do apologize. I'm having one of *those*
days, and my Motrin isn't kicking in for some reason. ;(
- -Phillip R. Jaenke (email@example.com | InterNIC: PRJ5)
"Look. It works this way." "Why?" "Because the designer said so."
"Why?" "Because the designer is a moron. Let's fix it." --anon.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----