Re: Resolutions to comments on LSB-FHS-TS_SPEC_V1.0
- To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
- Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com>, alan@cymru.net, tytso@mit.edu, quinlan@transmeta.com, gordon.m.tetlow@vanderbilt.edu, florian@suse.de, hpa@transmeta.com, ewt@redhat.com, fhs-discuss@ucsd.edu, ajosey@rdg.opengroup.org, lsb-test@linuxbase.org, lsb-spec@linuxbase.org, lsb-spec@lists.linuxbase.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Resolutions to comments on LSB-FHS-TS_SPEC_V1.0
- From: Dale Scheetz <dwarf@polaris.net>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 14:48:32 -0500 (EST)
- Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.990130144725.31752D-100000@dwarf.polaris.net>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] m106fqH-0007U1C@the-village.bc.nu>
On Sat, 30 Jan 1999, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> I'd like to propose that for now the FHS is changed to read
>
> "The mail spool area location is undefined. It is guaranteed that both
> /var/mail and /var/spool/mail point to this mail spool area if the system
> has a mail spool. The preferred reference name is /var/mail.
>
> [Rationale: /var/mail is the only name available on some other modern Unix
> platforms. /var/spool/mail is the older Linux tradition and needed for
> compatibility]
>
> [Rationale2: The physical location of the mail spool is not relevant to
> an application and is administrator policy. It is thus left open.]
>
>
> Can everyone live with that and bury the thread
Works for me.
Dwarf
--
_-_-_-_-_- Author of "The Debian Linux User's Guide" _-_-_-_-_-_-
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (850) 656-9769
Flexible Software 11000 McCrackin Road
e-mail: dwarf@polaris.net Tallahassee, FL 32308
_-_-_-_-_-_- If you don't see what you want, just ask _-_-_-_-_-_-_-
Reply to: