Re: DFSG v2 Draft #5
On Mon, Jan 25, 1999 at 01:24:13AM -0800, Darren Benham wrote:
>
> On 25-Jan-99 Chris Lawrence wrote:
> > IMHO we should also be discussing how the vote on this proposal will
> > be structured. My understanding is that there are multiple DFSG
> > revision proposals "out there", even though this one is the only one
> > being currently hashed out on the list.
> >
> > My voting structure proposal is (using preference voting):
> >
> > [ ] Retain current DFSG
> > [ ] Revised DFSG proposal by A and B
> > [ ] Revised DFSG proposal by C
> > ...
> > [ ] None of the above alternatives is acceptable
> >
>
> I envision it as being:
>
> [ ] ORIGINAL Draft
> [ ] Draft w/o patch clause
> [ ] Draft w/o advertising clause
> [ ] Draft w/o both clauses
> [ ] Current DFSG
> [ ] FURTHER Discussion (required by constitution)
Please include URLs, there are SO MANY different proposals we really
should give people pointers to exactly which they're voting on.
--
"I'm working in the dark here." "Yeah well rumor has it you do your best
work in the dark."
-- Earth: Final Conflict
Reply to: