Re: Time to drop binary -> binary-i386?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Regarding "Re: Time to drop binary -> binary-i386?" of 6:17 PM -0500
1/15/98, James A.Treacy wrote:
>> I think it's time to drop the above link. Nowardays Debian GNU/Linux
>> runs on five different architectures and not only on intel-based
>> machines. Dselect should already be able to know on which
>> architecture the system runs so we don't need it anymore.
>>
>A big 'me too'. I sugested this in the fall and the only responses
>I got were negative.
I agree too. Who wants to file the bug report against ftp.debian.org? ;-)
- --
Joel "Espy" Klecker Debian GNU/Linux Developer <mailto:jk@espy.org>
<http://www.espy.org/> <http://www.debian.org/>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBNL6koAoYIlYX1XaBAQH+DwP/Wp0Pz+1wFAFjhIzZhFxmCSCT/+20SrTn
etpIEY2jZ4a+CjrfsOD4caH6hPzE6oAayuDmm04qZwfc1b+Xzc7ud4jPzoov114Z
1BTI0As3jLqBRbjYmh50AQG6ynjdHsvKPQbdUtrkoQCvrjQKc92Ji/TV4HM+QT7f
lIblkthue6g=
=fOW3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: