Re: Status of the LPR package
>> "SVK" == Sergey V Kovalyov <sqk0316@SCIRES.ACF.NYU.EDU> writes:
SVK> On Tue, 17 Nov 1998, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
>> Then you just print to the local printer, which filters the input and sends
>> it to the other definition (which as a remote definition ignores any
>> filtering _it_ has - i.e. none) which sends it to the printer.
SVK> AFAIK this would work only with lprng, not with lpr, and it is
SVK> still WORKAROUND.
No, this is the workaround for lpr. lprng will apply filters for
remote printers. AFAIR.