Re: Having a non-free and a non-cd branch?
On Mon, Jun 29, 1998 at 10:50:10AM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 1998 at 06:05:12AM +0200, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> > Philip Hands wrote:
>
> I think this is right.
> But what is with klynx? lynx is 'true' GPL-software. The kde-people get it and
> make klynx with it. klynx is not true GPL-Software! And we have it in Contrib.
> We should move it to non-free or to /dev/null.
> (I don't know the copyright from the others kde-programs like kdvi, kghostview
> etc.. We must check all the copyright. )
>
> What say the maintainer from the k-tools?
I´m wondering for a long time what all the original authors think of
the KDE porting progress. I would heavily object if they would link
a GPL program of mine with Qt.
The situation with Klynx is that the original author made
the port partly himself, so I don´t think he objects :)
Marcus
--
"Rhubarb is no Egyptian god." Debian GNU/Linux finger brinkmd@
Marcus Brinkmann http://www.debian.org master.debian.org
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de for public PGP Key
http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/ PGP Key ID 36E7CD09
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: