Re: Having a non-free and a non-cd branch?
Kevin Atkinson <kevina@clark.net> wrote:
> Sorry, I didn't mean to say non-GPL. Want I mean to say is that I
> think companies should be rewarded for distributing there programs
> freely even if they are not complete free by debian's standard.
You want us to reward companies by violating their licenses?
Sorry, but you are very wrong -- this is not a good way to be nice to a
company.
For the case of Qt, it very explicitly places limits on redistribution,
which means we have a choice: follow those restrictions or not.
We're following those restrictions.
I think we've made the right choice.
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: