Re: Source package name for versioned libs.

To: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Source package name for versioned libs.
From: Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>
Date: 26 Jun 1998 19:45:03 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 87emwbekq8.fsf@nevermore.csres.utexas.edu>
In-reply-to: Raul Miller's message of "Fri, 26 Jun 1998 20:41:30 -0400"
References: <[🔎] 87hg17el9h.fsf@nevermore.csres.utexas.edu> <[🔎] 19980626204130.H9094@test.legislate.com>

Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com> writes:

> In my opinion (and in the opinion of some others -- there's been a fair
> bit of chatting about this) this is something that we should fix.

OK then, barring objections, the Boehm source package will have the
shared lib major number in it.

-- 
Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Source package name for versioned libs.
  - From: Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>
- Re: Source package name for versioned libs.
  - From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Source package name for versioned libs.
Next by Date: Bug#23867: Critical permissions bug on /lib and /tmp
Previous by thread: Re: Source package name for versioned libs.
Next by thread: Dependency issue of the manpages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread