Re: Source package name for versioned libs.

To: Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Source package name for versioned libs.
From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 20:41:30 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980626204130.H9094@test.legislate.com>
Mail-followup-to: Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87hg17el9h.fsf@nevermore.csres.utexas.edu>; from Rob Browning on Fri, Jun 26, 1998 at 07:33:30PM -0500
References: <[🔎] 87hg17el9h.fsf@nevermore.csres.utexas.edu>

Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu> wrote:
> Not good (or am I overlooking something?)

In general, we haven't done a good job of keeping stable packages around,
except at release points.

In my opinion (and in the opinion of some others -- there's been a fair
bit of chatting about this) this is something that we should fix.

-- 
Raul


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Source package name for versioned libs.
  - From: Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>

References:
- Source package name for versioned libs.
  - From: Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>

Prev by Date: Source package name for versioned libs.
Next by Date: Re: Source package name for versioned libs.
Previous by thread: Source package name for versioned libs.
Next by thread: Re: Source package name for versioned libs.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread