Re: libc6_2.0.7 release notes...
Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com> writes:
> > Not where 1.0 follows 3.14, for example.
James Troup <J.J.Troup@scm.brad.ac.uk> wrote:
> You clearly can, as I demonstrated in my footnote.
No. If your footnote was applicable at all, it was not providing a
suffix to the current version number. Instead it was providng a prefix.
We already have epochs to provide a prefix.
> Anyway, this is obviously somewhat of a religious issue, and having
> said that I whole heartedly agree with Manoj (that there are *zero*
> technical arguments against epochs), I will now shut up and ignore
> this thread.
I believe the scope issue constitutes a technical argument.
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: