Re: libc6_2.0.7 release notes...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, 23 Jun 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 1998 at 11:54:05AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> > In both these examples the "cludge" only hangs around for a while, while
> > the epoch gets stuck on the version forever.
>
> Is it really that bad? You said you don't want the clutter of it but
> I can't really see how there is much clutter. I find Santiago's
> suggestion of a manual upgrade absurd.
It may be true that forcing our users to upgrade by hand one day before
the beta release day, once that hamm is in "deep freeze mode", and once
that lots of people have already installed hamm is a great inconvenience
for many of them and a bad idea, but it would not be the first time we
tell our users to upgrade a package "by hand" (remember the upgrade from
Debian 1.2 to 1.3?). So the issue about being "absurd" or not would be
relative, not absolute.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNY90HCqK7IlOjMLFAQFpKgP7BaV8lbBqBUICCNsLCYxGHxlG93CWSyOJ
57IvvumGv6RwR565sRHxJpMA38DZGfyTenGtU9HQj0VjrvoQnk0J80xSONkTCTwF
UYLiAsgx6+sR9/PPf5TRRziofwJBeMwp+ozksT0bHeqVmTeIFCeolMLScfbuDYuB
ZYYnkDAyJjU=
=PCNn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: