Re: Release management - technical
> Why? We could have both versions of these programs around for some
> time.
> For instance we add a login-pam package so whoever wants can work with
> it. Once all packages have their -pam package we can switch over to
> fully pam support.
>
> Or we could put the pam aware packages into experimental.
>
> Michael
>
> --
> Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
> meskes@topsystem.de | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
> meskes@debian.org | 52146 Wuerselen
> Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
> Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Craig Sanders [SMTP:cas@taz.net.au]
> > Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 4:17 PM
> > To: Ian Jackson
> > Subject: Re: Release management - technical
> >
> > anyway, what i really wanted to say here was that sometimes releases
> > do have to be delayed to meet some goals. i think that the upgrade
> to
> > libc6 was one of them (but i think hamm met that goal around August
> or
> > September last year, and could have been released anytime after
> that).
> >
> > I suspect that another such goal will be PAM....it doesn't do much
> > good
> > to have half a PAM-enabled system. For PAM, we need all the typical
> > login authentication stuff linked against PAM and we also need
> > PAMified
> > versions of sendmail, smail, etc so that mail can be delivered for
> > users
> > who only exist in a radius or LDAP directory and not in /etc/passwd.
> >
> >
> > craig
> >
> > --
> > craig sanders
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> > listmaster@lists.debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: