Re: libc6_2.0.7 release notes...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Santiago Vila wrote:
> > But I believe that most of our users will agree that 2.0.7-1 is a much
> > nicer version number than 2.0.7r-1 and would not mind to install a few
> > packages by hand just *once*.
> It's not having to install a few packages by hand, it's breaking all
> dependencies on libc6 2.0.7pre* which a lot of packages have.
Well, how many packages have a dependency like that which are not
generated from the glibc package proper?
Could please indentify them? [ I did not found many ].
> This would mean that all packages compiled with a pre-version must be
> recompiled to fix their dependencies.
True, but if there are not many of them, it could be not so bad,
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org