Re: libc6_2.0.7 release notes...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Lot of people said:
> What's wrong with using epochs?
epochs last forever, and most people consider them an ugly thing.
Moreover, there is a paragraph in the policy saying that epochs are not
for dealing with "pre" version numbers.
If there is something to solve here, "2.0.7r" would be a better solution,
IMHO, because at least it would allow us to get rid of both the epoch and
the "r" thing in "2.0.8".
But I believe that most of our users will agree that 2.0.7-1 is a much
nicer version number than 2.0.7r-1 and would not mind to install a few
packages by hand just *once*.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNY4k0yqK7IlOjMLFAQFzNAP/Z7SbBcHUvBUNLzdyCbsaqFKw7KfCKHuB
VCSH9RpeXMCKJ3NpjyDzNztVnCpUD9QVsH1FjgITSDXwaNnCCj5BMyo2j1WYzRF4
p/3CUcDKR4IlWrTrbbaRSXieh6nY+DRTL6NMrhkRMzNoCzKPgOUt8EP6VkrhXoU0
MYOLHMD27Io=
=yf/q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: