Re: PAM and slink (was Re: packaging PAM modules? anyone?)
apharris@burrito.onshore.com (Adam P. Harris) writes:
> gsstark@mit.edu (Gregory S. Stark) writes:
> > I asked once earlier, but no one responded:
> > Does anyone know how PAM modules should be packaged?
> Gregory, I'm sorry I cannot provide good technical information. I do
> know that we had backed out PAM-ifying hamm sometime last year. I
> think we should re-PAM-ify everything (i.e., pam version of login,
> passwd, etc etc). I think PAM is stable now and should be embraced
> for slink.
> But I could certainly be wrong.
I'd like to see PAM in slink.
Steve
dunham@cps.msu.edu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: