PAM and slink (was Re: packaging PAM modules? anyone?)
gsstark@mit.edu (Gregory S. Stark) writes:
> I asked once earlier, but no one responded:
> Does anyone know how PAM modules should be packaged?
Gregory, I'm sorry I cannot provide good technical information. I do
know that we had backed out PAM-ifying hamm sometime last year. I
think we should re-PAM-ify everything (i.e., pam version of login,
passwd, etc etc). I think PAM is stable now and should be embraced
for slink.
But I could certainly be wrong.
--
.....A. P. Harris...apharris@onShore.com...<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: