Re: Bug Terrorism
Scott Ellis <storm@gate.net> writes:
> No, you're not hiding this on the bug tracking system any more.
>
Come on, cool down! That´s a bad way to get this resolved. Please
DON´T do that again. I think -private would have been more apropriate.
I know everybody is getting nervous in this deep freeze.
So please consider:
Is the bad behaviour (the bug) really that critical or will the
solution introduce new behaviour?
In addition, I think it should be in the hands of the maintainer what
is considered a bug or a feature. This follows close from the main
principle in free software: The one who does the work, is the one who
decides. (And decide is meant to cover almost everything about a
piece of software: if you don´t like it, feel free to open a
competition by changing and releasing it the way you like --- see
discussion on name for deity, no: apt, or emacs vs. xemacs).
And don´t forget, we all play on the same team.
grimaldi alias Jens Ritter
---
Jens.Ritter@weh.rwth-aachen.de grimaldi@debian.org
Key ID: 2048/E451C639 Jens Ritter
Key fingerprint: 5F 3D 43 1E 24 1E CC 48 1E 05 93 3A A7 10 73 37
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: