[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: apt and hamm



At 16 Jun 1998 11:42:39 -0400, Bob Hilliard <hilliard@flinet.com> wrote:
> apharris@burrito.onshore.com (Adam P. Harris) writes:
> 
> > 
> > Bob Hilliard <hilliard@flinet.com> writes:
> > >      I will be out of town after tomorrow for about a week, so I won't
> > > be able to do anything on the README before then, but I don't think
> > > 2.0 will be released before then.
> > 
> > Perhaps not.  Anyhow we should take the autoup README and also add
> > alternative instructions for using apt, I think.  If anyone's
> > interested (especially Bob!) I have a collection of notes on how to go
> > about upgrading with apt.
>
>      Do you contemplate making one upgrade document that includes both
> autoup and apt?  If so, please mail me your notes (directly please, I
> will probably unsubscribe from the lists for a week), and I will
> prepare a draft of such a document as soon as I get back early next
> week.  

Yes, basically it would be all merged together with the release notes
for Debian 2.0; that's what Igor Groebman seemed to be saying.  He
also told me the person who volunteered to do it disappeared.  It
would be fabulous if you could do that document!

>      If this needs to be an sgml document, please give me detailed
> instructions, as I have never used sgml (I normally use emacs for
> everything; I know emacs has an sgml mode, but I don't know how to use
> it.  Does a document have to be started under sgml, or can I write in
> emacs and then call the sgml mode to convert it?)

Make it easy on yourself, stick with straight ASCII.  Is ok with me.

>      On a related note, autoup.sh can upgrade a buzz (1.1.x) system,
> but it must have dpkg version 1.4 or higher available.  So a .deb from
> bo is required on the CD - probably in the same directory where
> autoup.sh resides.  It certainly shouldn't be in the regular archive!

Excellent; good idea.  I hope Andres Jellinghaus (sp?) is listening?

Bob, I'll send the notes to you privately in the next message.
Please rely on me for clarifications and improvements.

As far as the broader issue of constructing the release notes, I don't 
know what else we have to work with, excepting perhaps the Debian 1.3
release notes and the 2.0 design goals documents.

Gluck!

.....A. P. Harris...apharris@onShore.com...<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>

Attachment: pgpbRE0Y9xAEC.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: