Re: vim 5.1 in hamm
> Previously Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> >And the upstream author also says we really should put 5.1 in hamm,
> > and who would want to argue with him?
>
> I've just checked the 5.0 -> 5.1 changelog. Basically some a whole bunch of
> errors have been fixedand Win32-support has been vastly improved,
>
> There are some new features though. I'll put the changelog below.
>
> Personally, I would like to see vim 5.1 in hamm, but that's just me.
> As a vim-addict I'm somewhat subjective here.
>
> Wichert.
Well, as another vim addict, I would also like to see most secent stable
release of VIM in hamm.
(But on the other hand, as a real VIM addict, I always compile all the vim
"alphas" myself - and with Motif GUI).
In any case. if author thinks that including 5.1 is the way to go, I guess we
should at least consider that.
Alex Y.
--
_
_( )_
( (o___ +-------------------------------------------+
| _ 7 | Alexander Yukhimets |
\ (") | http://pages.nyu.edu/~aqy6633/ |
/ \ \ +-------------------------------------------+
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: