Previously Nikita Schmidt wrote: > When run on Alpha, vim produces an unaligned trap. In fact, the problem > is more serious than just the unaligned access, for there happens to be > a long access to an int quantity (see the patch below). This problem > also exists in 5.0-0.2 and 5.1. I'm building a NMU which fixes this. One for 5.0 in hamm and one for 5.1 in slink. About 5.1 being put into hamm.. The 5.1 package solves some problems and is IMHO better configured with respect to syntax-highlighting and X-stuff. And the upstream author also says we really should put 5.1 in hamm, and who would want to argue with him? Wichert. -- ============================================================================== This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman. E-Mail: wakkerma@wi.LeidenUniv.nl WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
Attachment:
pgpHr0oDVxoq9.pgp
Description: PGP signature