Re: Building a connection with Kachina Tech.
To the extent that I have a goal in Debian , its packaging these
things (I've already done three or four) . For the time being, I am
putting it all in 'math'. We may want to change the name or granularity at
some point, if packging these things really takes off. I agree that 'sci'
would be a better description than 'math'.
On Mon, 15 Jun 1998, Alexander Kushnirenko wrote:
> Hi, Johnie!
> >
> > Some SAL classifications include chemistry, biology, artificial
> > intelligence, physics, astronomy, relational DBMS, parallel computing,
> > geographic information systems, and scientific data processing and
> > visualization, some of which are poorly described by "math".
> >
> Agreed. But perhaps putting all of that in "math" is as good solution as
> putting it all in "sci". Maybe finer granularity would do it, but I don't
> know what are the consequences of that. Perhaps I don't quite realise the
> problem :)
>
> Sasha.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
John Lapeyre <lapeyre@physics.arizona.edu>
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: