[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: apt and hamm



On Sun, Jun 14, 1998 at 01:07:33AM +0200, Remco Blaakmeer wrote:
> > [Yeah, it's new software -- it's also the best way to keep the hamm
> > upgrade from completely breaking an existing debian installation.]
> The autoup.sh script also does the job well, doesn't it?

Not for new installs. Having things break when you run dselect on just
the Standard system is not an impressive way to do a new install, IMHO.

[I'm referring to the `[I]nstall, [C]onfigure, [I]nstall, [C]onfigure...'
 jitters that Apt avoids quite nicely]

My personal opinion is that Apt is *already* the way to go. If the
devteam managed to get it partly done before we'd expected or hoped, I
think we should recommend it as the upgrade method, and include it in
the base2_0.tgz in place of dpkg-ftp.

[Not that I'd know, mind]

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. PGP encrypted mail preferred.

      ``It's not a vision, or a fear. It's just a thought.''

Attachment: pgpVEgX3WXJ1a.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: