Re: apt and hamm
On Sat, 13 Jun 1998, Raul Miller wrote:
> I noticed that apt is not yet in hamm. In my opinion, this is the
> currently the single most important issue for hamm: unless we have
> a real good reason, we should be focussing our efforts around putting
> apt into hamm.
IMHO, the single most important issue for hamm is that it becomes stable.
Adding new software only slows down that process. And apt wasn't meant to
be in Debian 2.0 anyway.
> [Yeah, it's new software -- it's also the best way to keep the hamm
> upgrade from completely breaking an existing debian installation.]
The autoup.sh script also does the job well, doesn't it?
Remco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: