Re: another look at release-critical bugs: lpr
On Wed 03 Jun 1998, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Sat, 30 May 1998, Jay Wardle wrote:
> > [...Raul wrote...]
> > > If this can't be fixed easily, perhaps we ought to promote lprng to
> > > standard and demote lpr to optional. Yes, I know that bug-for-bug
> > > compatability is a nice thing, but in my experience lprng is superior to
> > > lpr.
If you take a look at the bug report, you'll see that there's a
workaround already in place for this bug, but the maintainer left the
bug report intact because he wants to find a cleaner solution.
Hence this discussion of lpr <-> lprng is pretty much off-topic, and
distracting to the point in question.
He probably should have changed the priority to wishlist, however.
home: firstname.lastname@example.org | work: email@example.com
http://www.wurtel.demon.nl | Murphy Software, Enschede, the Netherlands
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com