Re: kernel 2.0.34 and hamm
Jim <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Speaking as a debian advocate, it would be highly embarrassing to try
> to explain something like "Oh yeah, the new kernel is there, but you
> can't use it yet since ..." where ... stems from the person's need for
> some dependant package. Example: say he needs pcmcia.
How is this different from bo, where we also had three kernel versions
available and only had pcmcia modules for the first two?
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org