Re: What version of glibc in Hamm?
On Sat, 6 Jun 1998 aqy6633@acf5.nyu.edu wrote:
> > > There is a good reason to include recent glibc into frozen - latest
> > > JDK-1.1.6 does not work with glibc from hamm.
> >
> > Umm, that's not a good reason. Certainly nothing like a good enough
> > reason to justify us shipping with an *out of date* pre-release.
>
> Sorry?
>
> What I tried to say is that latest JDK does not work with glibc from hamm,
> but DOES work with (more recent) glibc from slink. And I proposed to move
> slink glibc into frozen (hamm).
>
There were two reasons for putting this in unstable.
First: this is not the release version, and we are not going to ship hamm
with a prelease (see appropriate bug report) version of glibc.
Second: this was supposidly the last pre-release before the final version,
and I wanted it to get some testing.
I will be coming out with a "final" Debian version in the next week or
two, depending on how much Ulrich stonewalls the upstream release.
Waiting is,
Dwarf
--
_-_-_-_-_- Author of "The Debian Linux User's Guide" _-_-_-_-_-_-
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (850) 656-9769
Flexible Software 11000 McCrackin Road
e-mail: dwarf@polaris.net Tallahassee, FL 32308
_-_-_-_-_-_- If you don't see what you want, just ask _-_-_-_-_-_-_-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: