Re: What version of glibc in Hamm?
<email@example.com> (Alex Yukhimets) writes:
> > > There is a good reason to include recent glibc into frozen - latest
> > > JDK-1.1.6 does not work with glibc from hamm.
> > Umm, that's not a good reason. Certainly nothing like a good enough
> > reason to justify us shipping with an *out of date* pre-release.
> What I tried to say is that latest JDK does not work with glibc from hamm,
> but DOES work with (more recent) glibc from slink. And I proposed to move
> slink glibc into frozen (hamm).
*blink*... so you did. Sorry. I think I'll go get some sleep.
~Yawn And Walk North~
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com