On Sun, May 24, 1998 at 05:04:35PM -0400, Christopher Jason Morrone wrote: > > Maybe this is already the case, but wouldn't it make sense for the > > pine-whatever.deb to just include the source and a preinst script that > > actually ran the build, and the installed the resulting binary? > > Well, yes. But can we do that? Is anyone currently working on it? > > I remeber that there was opposition to make a pine-src .deb > file. And I agree, .deb's are for preconfigured executables. > > It just seems like there must be some way that we can get pine... Pine is sitting in incoming. It's been there for a few weeks now. One might think that there are some political reasons behind it still being there at this point.
Attachment:
pgpV1vlEHFTeK.pgp
Description: PGP signature