Re: Time to drop binary -> binary-i386?

[Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Regarding "Re: Time to drop binary -> binary-i386?" of 6:17 PM -0500
1/15/98, James A.Treacy wrote:
>> I think it's time to drop the above link.  Nowardays Debian GNU/Linux
>> runs on five different architectures and not only on intel-based
>> machines.  Dselect should already be able to know on which
>> architecture the system runs so we don't need it anymore.
>>
>A big 'me too'. I sugested this in the fall and the only responses
>I got were negative.

I agree too. Who wants to file the bug report against ftp.debian.org? ;-)

- --
Joel "Espy" Klecker     Debian GNU/Linux Developer    <mailto:jk@espy.org>
<http://www.espy.org/>                            <http://www.debian.org/>


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNL6koAoYIlYX1XaBAQH+DwP/Wp0Pz+1wFAFjhIzZhFxmCSCT/+20SrTn
etpIEY2jZ4a+CjrfsOD4caH6hPzE6oAayuDmm04qZwfc1b+Xzc7ud4jPzoov114Z
1BTI0As3jLqBRbjYmh50AQG6ynjdHsvKPQbdUtrkoQCvrjQKc92Ji/TV4HM+QT7f
lIblkthue6g=
=fOW3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .