Re: New bug Severity for release-goals?

[dark@xs4all.nl (Richard Braakman)]

Charles Briscoe-Smith wrote:
> How about `unreleasable'?

"unreleasable bugs" sounds odd :-)

> But surely any bug that holds up the release ought to be described as
> at least `grave' anyhow?

Well, "grave" means the package is broken.  Lots of packages don't
meet the release goals for 2.0 but still work fine.  I won't mind
if "grave" is redefined to include "Package will not be released
in this condition", but then that has to be made official before
I can use it in bugreports.

Richard Braakman


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .